Community
Products
Columns
Complications & Care
Food
Fitness
Medications
Monitoring
Research
Health Care
Psychology
Legal
Pregnancy
Celebrities
About Us
Diabetes Health eCards
Mini Pharmacy

Discuss this Topic in the Forum

Diabetes Health magazine
Diabetes Health
Diabetes Health magazine
Diabetes Health Professional
See What's Inside…

See the entire table of contents here!

Free Subscription to Diabetes Health Professional

The must-have resource for physicians, educators and medical professionals who focus on the treatment of diabetes.

Finally! A fresh take on the “professional” journal. Each bi-monthly issue cuts through the jargon and presents the most important information you need to enhance your practice and assist your patients.

Each bi-monthly issue of Diabetes Health Professional is a self-contained handbook covering products, educational resources and the latest diabetes research, complimented by balanced editorial focused on medical news, drug prescription information, clinical practice recommendations and changing treatment options.

Each quarter we send you the latest, most updated research guides, product guides and educational resource guides available for you and your patients.

Learn More About the Professional Subscription

Diabetes Health E-Newsletter

Each week the Diabetes Health E-Newsletter delivers links to the very latest in news, reviews, blogs and videos from Diabetes Health direct to your inbox.

See an example E-Newsletter

As a subscriber you'll get access to the amazing Diabetes Health Digital Advantage™ so you can read the current issue of Diabetes Health magazine online wherever you are!

Email Address:
Area of Interest:
Latest
Popular
Top Rated
Diabetes Health Reference Charts
Type 2 Issues Archives
Print | Email | Share | Comments (4)

The study shows that a set approach and an ad-hoc approach to bolus dosages both seem to work equally well in achieving glycemic control.

Study Shows Type 2s Can Lower BGs, A1c’s, Whether They Take Set Insulin Doses or Tailor Them to Carb Consumption

5 August 2008
Recommend this Article:

Average Rating:

Type 2s who tried out either of two different basal-bolus treatments using Lantus and Apidra enjoyed significant reductions in post-meal BG levels and longer-term A1c’s.

Published in the July 2008 issue of Diabetes Care, those conclusions were based on a study of 273 type 2 patients who were divided into two groups. Both groups used Lantus as their long-acting basal insulin and Apidra as their rapid-acting bolus insulin.

The “Simplified Algorithm” group took pre-set doses of Apidra before their meals. The dosages were based on their self-monitored BG results from the week before.

The “Carbohydrate Counting” group took doses of Apidra based on an insulin-to-carbohydrate ration. They adjusted their doses based on the amount of carbs they planned to consume at a meal.

At the end of the 24-week study, both groups enjoyed similar results: 73 percent of the “Simplified” group and 69 percent of the “Carb Counters” group achieved A1c’s of 7% or less (6.7% for the “Simplifieds” and 6.54% for the “Carb Counters”).

The overall reduction in A1c’s was 1.46% for the “Simplifieds” (down from 8.1%) and 1.59% for the “Carb Counters” (down from 8.3%).

Study participants ranged from 28 to 71 years in age and had had type 2 diabetes for at least six months. Each participant had been taking two or more insulin injections daily for at least three months before the study, and 33 percent of them were also taking metformin.

Thirty-seven percent entered the study using Lantus and at least one daily injection of a rapid-acting insulin analog. Thirty-six percent were using another pre-mixed insulin, and the remainder were on a combination of other diabetes treatment and drug regimens.

Study author Richard M. Bergenstal, MD, executive director of the International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet Health Services in Minneapolis, Minn., concluded that “a combination of basal and bolus insulin may be needed to achieve optimal glucose control in type 2 diabetes patients.” The study shows that a set approach and an ad-hoc approach to bolus dosages both seem to work equally well in achieving glycemic control.


Related Article

Type 2 Diabetes: Is Carb Counting Unnecessary?

31 July 2008


Recommend this Article:

Average Rating:


You May Also Be Interested In...

Type 1 Pop Star, Nick Jonas Tells His Story

comments 1177 comments - 26 Apr 2007

Insulin For Type 2 Diabetes: Who, When, And Why?

comments 147 comments - 29 Nov 2007

Jonas Brothers Update: Diabetes Has Not Slowed Down 15-Year-Old Nick Jonas

comments 113 comments - 2 Apr 2008

Jonas Brothers Band Member Reveals He Has Diabetes: Nick Jonas, age 14, hopes his story will inspire other kids with diabetes

comments 107 comments - 13 Mar 2007

Low Carbohydrate Diets: Why You Don't Want the "Experts" to Tell You What to Eat

comments 106 comments - 22 Sep 2008


Comments

Posted by Anonymous on 25 July 2008

I trust absolutely NOTHING that comes out of Park Nicolet's "International Diabetes Center". They are arrogant, condescending and derisive of Type II's. I have had repeated experiences with them, and wouldn't trust a diabetic dog to their care, even though I don't much like dogs.

Posted by wifey on 27 July 2008

My 79-year-old husband has been using this "simplified algorithm" method ever since Lantus has been available, (with the humalog when needed) and he's far more aware of his body reactions to the blood glucose levels. his HgA1c have always been around mid 6.
However, everything goes to hell when he goes into hospital. (He had TCC cancer and kidney problems) They insist on using "sliding scale" system (without Lantus or humalog) which gives him HUGE highs and lows.
Why, why, why, do they use this? It's crazy.

Posted by Anonymous on 8 August 2008

I think this article is covering the same research reported in another recent, but bit older, Diabetes Health article (http://www.diabeteshealth.com/read/2008/07/31/5851.html). The older report gives better guidance on the mechanics of the insulin adjustment methods and should be reviewed by anyone who finds this article interesting.

Posted by volleyball on 15 August 2008

I disagree with the findings unless there is a lot more information not provided.
A 24 week drop from 8.3 to 6.54 vs 8.1 to 6.7 seems significant to me. Plus what very BG during the day. did the carb control group have less highs and lows during the test? How well were the subjects able to calculate insulin requirements? I would think if this study ran a year, the results would have been more dramatic

Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.

When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.

For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.

Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.

Have Your Say...

Username: Password:
Comment: