This is a 'sham' study in that it does not test the near infra red anodyne therapy light that has had such success with practitioners as Dr Joe Prendergast at his large diabetic practice in California.

is this the same process as the anodyne machine uses? there were earlier stories in various diabetes outlets about this machine, available at some physical therapy offices, and its helpfulness visavis neuropathy in the feet. sgb

not accurate, as it does help diabetic legs--have seen many patients with significant improvement.

I have used the home unit for nearly nine months and have gotten a lowering of the pain level to a controllable level. This method has shown to be much more effective than the more than ten prescription medications I have tried in the past nine years. The extra bonus is there are no harmful side effects like so many of the pills.

Regardless of what this articles say, for the first time in years my feet are not sore and swollen; keeping me awake at night. I can actually wear shoes now. This was only after a few treatments. It's non-invasive and is not a drug. What could be better?

I have had a chance to research this therapy and receive NIR infrared treatments with great success. I had a small diabetic ulcer and severe numbness. The ulcer is now healed, and I am walking better now that I have regained feeling.