| Sitemap | Subscribe | Contact Us | ||
|
Each week the Diabetes Health E-Newsletter delivers links to the very latest in news, reviews, blogs and videos from Diabetes Health direct to your inbox.
As a subscriber you'll get access to the amazing Diabetes Health Digital Advantage™ so you can read the current issue of Diabetes Health magazine online wherever you are!
Latest Type 2 Articles
Stevia is a natural sweetener made from the leaves of a South American herb, Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, commonly known as sweetleaf or sugarleaf.
It's a rather controversial herb, in that it has been approved as a food additive in several countries, including Brazil, China, and Japan, but has been banned in Europe, Hongkong, and Singapore.
In America, we've gone at it both ways: Stevia can be sold as a dietary supplement, but it cannot be promoted as a sweetener or used as a food additive.
The FDA categorizes stevia as "an unsafe food additive" because "there is no regulation in effect that provides for the safe use of stevia, nor is there a sufficient basis to conclude that stevia is generally recognized as safe among qualified experts for its intended use in food."
In fact, says the FDA, "literature reports have raised safety concerns about the use of stevia, including concerns about control of blood sugar and effects upon the reproductive, cardiovascular, and renal systems."
Stevia has been labeled as an "unsafe food additive" since 1991, when its import was restricted at the request of an anonymous party. The complainant has never been identified, but many stevia enthusiasts believe that the sweetener industry was behind the complaint. Stevia remained banned until 1995, when the 1994 Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act forced the FDA to allow stevia as a dietary supplement, although not as a food additive.
There have been some investigations into the safety of stevia, most of which are criticized as poorly done by stevia enthusiasts. According to one study, male rats fed high doses of stevioside (the component of stevia that makes it sweet) for 22 months ended up with reduced sperm production.
When female hamsters were fed large amounts of a derivative of stevioside called steviol, they had fewer and smaller offspring. In the laboratory, steviol can be converted into a compound that may promote cancer by causing mutations in DNA; however, whether that conversion happens in humans is questionable. Finally, very large amounts of stevioside reportedly can interfere with the absorption of carbohydrates in animals and disrupt the conversion of food into energy within cells.
Stevia proponents brush aside these studies as flawed, preferring to point to recent research by the World Health Organization (WHO), which concluded in 2006 that stevioside is not genotoxic, that the genotoxicity of steviol in the test tube doesn't occur in living creatures, and that evidence of carcinogenic activity does not exist.
During thirty years of stevia use in Japan, no adverse reactions have surfaced. On the other hand, the Japanese are apparently moderate in their stevia consumption, whereas there is some concern by the powers that be that we gluttonous Americans would pile on the stevia to potentially toxic levels. It does appear, however, that if you use stevia leaves sparingly, you should be okay.
Sources: FDA, August 2007; Medline Plus; Wikipedia; Center for Science in the Public Interest
18 comments - 1 May 2008
18 comments - 1 May 2008
11 comments - 21 Apr 2008
8 comments - 28 Apr 2008
Comments...
Add your comments about this article below. You can add comments as a registered user or anonymously. If you choose to post anonymously your comments will be sent to our moderator for approval before they appear on this page. If you choose to post as a registered user your comments will appear instantly.
When voicing your views via the comment feature, please respect the Diabetes Health community by refraining from comments that could be considered offensive to other people. Diabetes Health reserves the right to remove comments when necessary to maintain the cordial voice of the diabetes community.
For your privacy and protection, we ask that you do not include personal details such as address or telephone number in any comments posted.
Don't have your Diabetes Health Username? Register now and add your comments to all our content.
Register..
Register your Diabetes Health Username here.
I've been using stevia in my morning 2-cups of coffee for 10 years. No signs of a third limb or eye and I don't have problems with my reproductive organs. I'm also type 1 diabetic and have a A1c of 5.4. What's really going on with the FDA?
I have used Stevia for 5 years now and love it! Why would you use a product that has chemicals and toxins in it (even though it has been approved by the FDA) instead of using an all natural product?
I buy Stevia from my local Seattle food co-op, Puget Consumers Co-op. Only tiny amounts are needed. It has no sugars, no lactose, malto-dextrin, no corn syrup added.
I only use 1/3 of a pack of Stevia when adding to beverages. Using the entire packet makes beverages too sweet. A box of 50 lasts me 5-6 months.
Coming from Canada I have used Stevia for several years and like it.No side effects.I look hard to find it as it is not sold everywhere.There are no chemicals to worry about in Stevia.Other sweetners taste bitter to me.This one doesn't.Being diabetic I must take care of me.I agree that others don't want Stevia because it is a healthy, natural sweetner.
Cargill and Coke are developing a Stevia based sweetener called Rebiana. You'll see it approved by the FDA in a few years. Another natural sweetener with a bright future is Luo Han Guo, currently being studied by many including Tate & Lyle - Splenda manufacturers.
They're both safe.
Have Your Say...