| My Account | Subscribe | Contact Us | Donate |
Rachel and her husband chose to adopt a baby instead of meeting the challenges of handling a high risk pregnancy and Rachel’s type 1 diabetes at the same time. She shares their thought process and ultimate happy ending about the decision to bring a child into their lives.
Hosting Hardball on MSNBC and The Chris Matthews Show keep Chris Matthews working long hours. But Matthews got a lesson in priorities and made some life changes when he was diagnosed with type 2.
Olivia and her dog both have diabetes and today they comfort and encourage each other through the rigors of dealing with the disease. Plus, find out what it means when your domestic pet is diagnosed with diabetes.
Smoking has severe effects on your diabetes and your health. Learn why diabetes and smoking are an especially bad combination and get some tips from the experts on how to quit.
CGM is a relatively new technology, but the information it provides is invaluable. Find out what CGM offers and whether it could help you.
The must-have resource for physicians, educators and medical professionals who focus on the treatment of diabetes.
Finally! A fresh take on the “professional” journal. Each bi-monthly issue cuts through the jargon and presents the most important information you need to enhance your practice and assist your patients.
Each bi-monthly issue of Diabetes Health Professional is a self-contained handbook covering products, educational resources and the latest diabetes research, complimented by balanced editorial focused on medical news, drug prescription information, clinical practice recommendations and changing treatment options.
Each quarter we send you the latest, most updated research guides, product guides and educational resource guides available for you and your patients.
Each week the Diabetes Health E-Newsletter delivers links to the very latest in news, reviews, blogs and videos from Diabetes Health direct to your inbox.
As a subscriber you'll get access to the amazing Diabetes Health Digital Advantage™ so you can read the current issue of Diabetes Health magazine online wherever you are!
Latest Type 2 Issues Articles
We recently wrote about a study which concluded that blood glucose meters are a waste of time for people with type 2 diabetes who are not using insulin ("Is Using a Meter a Waste of Time for Type 2s?"). Our readers vehemently disagreed with that conclusion.
Now a lengthy study in the British Medical Journal has delved into the reasons why meters are often not used effectively by people with type 2. And it has concluded that the problem lies, first, in caregivers' failure to educate type 2s about how to respond to blood sugar readings, and, second, in an apparent disinterest in meter readings on the part of healthcare professionals.
The British study involved eighteen Scottish patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes who were not taking insulin. They were interviewed three times in the first year and then once again three years later. By the end of the study, many had stopped self-monitoring altogether, and the remainder were doing so less frequently.
None of the patients had received explicit messages from their healthcare providers about when, how, and why they should be testing their blood sugar. Most of the patients believed that they were testing for the benefit of their caregivers only, not for their own information. And many of their doctors didn't encourage meter use. As one patient said, "At first Dr. M thought that the meter thing might be a bit fiddly for me."
When the caregivers didn't seem to care, the patients lost interest in testing. They began to feel that self-monitoring was "pointless" because "nobody ever looks at it." Said one, "I did gather the impression that they didn't really bother too much with the day to day results…and it seemed to me that it maybe wasn't worth keeping an eye on all of this."
Most subjects felt that their doctors were interested only in their A1c's, not in their meter readings. One said, "They would be more concerned about the three monthly reading…and that didn't take account of my concerns, which were the big spikes I was getting."
The subjects were generally reassured by lower readings and understood that by eating they could raise their blood sugar. However, they had no idea how to make use of high readings, which either bamboozled them completely or made them anxious. Said one about high readings, "What do you do when it's high? [The diabetes nurse] never explained that." Said another, "What if it goes high? What do you do to bring it down?"
Instead of using their blood glucose readings to understand their responses to food and activity and to guide long-term change, many participants interpreted their readings only as a reflection of short-term "good or bad" behavior. Said one person, "It's telling me if I'm being bad…and I think, 'uh oh, I ain't using you [the meter] today.'" They worried about how much they had just eaten, but didn't consider other aspects of management, such as changing their overall diet, medication, or exercise regimen. Many of them were convinced that they could accurately guess their blood levels without using a meter.
In light of these findings, the researchers recommend that education about monitoring should be ongoing, with particular emphasis on how to respond to high readings. The relation between individual readings and patterns should be clarified, as well as the relationship between individual readings and A1c's. Without such education and interest on the part of healthcare professionals, people with type 2 are often left in the dark when it comes to their meters.
Source: British Medical Journal, August 2007
Categories: Meters, Type 2 Issues
Email to a Friend
Send a link to this page to your friends and colleagues.